Skip Navigation


Literary and Linguistic Computing Advance Access originally published online on March 2, 2005
Literary and Linguistic Computing 2005 20(1):103-116; doi:10.1093/llc/fqh046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/103    most recent
fqh046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Witt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lüngen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Articles

Unification of XML Documents with Concurrent Markup

Andreas Witt, Daniela Goecke, Felix Sasaki and Harald Lüngen

Bielefeld University, Bielefeld Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen

Harald Lüngen, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, FB05 – Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft und Computerlinguistik, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10 D, D-35394 Gießen. E-mail: luengen{at}uni-giessen.de
An approach to the unification of XML (Extensible Markup Language) documents with identical textual content and concurrent markup in the framework of XML-based multi-layer annotation is introduced. A Prolog program allows the possible relationships between element instances on two annotation layers that share PCDATA to be explored and also the computing of a target node hierarchy for a well-formed, merged XML document. Special attention is paid to identity conflicts between element instances, for which a default solution that takes into account metarelations that hold between element types on the different annotation layers is provided. In addition, rules can be specified by a user to prescribe how identity conflicts should be solved for certain element types.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Lit Linguist ComputingHome page
A. Witt, G. Rehm, E. Hinrichs, T. Lehmberg, and J. Stegmann
SusTEInability of linguistic resources through feature structures
Lit Linguist Computing, September 1, 2009; 24(3): 363 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.