Skip Navigation

Literary and Linguistic Computing 2004 19(3):373-384; doi:10.1093/llc/19.3.373
© 2004 by Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Losh, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Reading Room(s): Building a National Archive in Digital Spaces and Physical Places

Elizabeth Losh1

1 University of California, Irvine, US

As the physical building of a national library can serve as a tangible expression of political and cultural philosophy, a given digital archive manifests ideological features of the national legacy it preserves and disseminates electronically. Millennial discourses have influenced national library building projects in both physical and digital archives. However, a simple analogy between conventional and electronic spaces is inadequate, because national policies on digitizing documents and regulating access engender contradictory impulses in archivists and policy makers. Although considerable attention has recently focused on the ‘right to read’, the physical space of a document archive is constituted by prohibitions on reading. In a 2002 survey, the degree of regulation varied greatly depending on national context. The Bibliothèque Nationale de France made its digital collection widely and anonymously available, but closely surveiled readers in its physical space. The Library of Congress offered democratic access and embraced an ‘open source’ approach to cataloguing, but corporate and public interests were in conflict, and ‘born digital’ documents created a policy crisis. The British Library offered an interface that emulated turning pages of rare tomes but came late to prioritize searchable text encoding. In contrast, the Danvers Archival Center offered a model of a ‘local’ archive that asserted its social function in a particular community but also claimed a role in shaping digital resources.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.