Skip Navigation

Literary and Linguistic Computing 2001 16(2):189-198; doi:10.1093/llc/16.2.189
© 2001 by Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tetreault, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

New Models for Electronic Publishing

Ronald Tetreault

Dalhousie University Halifax, N.S., Canada

Correspondence: Ronald Tetreault, Department of English, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 3J5. E-mail: tetro{at}IS.Dal.Ca
Any project in the electronic medium that lays claim to scholarly authority will require adaptations in both the presentation and the dissemination of its materials. Work in progress on an electronic edition of Lyrical Ballads illustrates how these changes may be realized, and brings home the lesson that the evolution of electronic publishing will necessitate innovations that are not just technological but also institutional. A new method of marshalling scholarly apparatus called ‘dynamic collation’ has been employed in this project, which reconceptualizes how variant readings can be presented in the digital medium. The real challenge for online publication, however, is what might be called the lack of mature institutional structures on the Internet. So long as anyone can publish anything on WWW, the quality of its materials remains questionable; furthermore, in the absence of independent web-based publishing houses, personal postings are all too often ephemeral. The imprimatur of an established publisher (in this case, the Cambridge University Press) would be a guarantee of the reliability and durability of these immaterial texts, but entails the development of new publication partnerships. It seems the future of electronic publishing depends upon asking questions about more than technical standards. Online scholarly archives must also meet standards of peer evaluation, editorial practice, and institutional backing that have traditionally ensured the quality of print publications.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.