Skip Navigation

Literary and Linguistic Computing 2000 15(1):109-114; doi:10.1093/llc/15.1.109
© 2000 by Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crasson, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Pour une lecture ouverte du texte électronique

A Crasson

Institut des Textes et Manuscrits, Modernes, 45, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France E-mail: acrasson@club-internet.fr

It is apparent that the presentation of a text in the electronic medium as a string of electronic characters may have advantages for scholarly reading. Because it is dynamic, the text on the screen offers the reader many possible kinds of fragmentation. Study of scholarly uses of such texts shows that the segmentations in the text depend on the computer treatments available, such as indexing or linking commentaries. The hypertextual paths induced in such a way by the constraints of indexing systems or on the adjacent commentaries are different from a so-called 'open' reading (in the sense of a reader's engagement), which aims to permit the reader to define paths according to previously determined units. This statement allows us to reopen the debate on the relationship between digitization and hypertextualization. Moreover, it raises questions about the type of reading that emerges from codification and structuring models. The argument of this paper is that the status as object of electronic forms of canonical texts must be reconsidered according to the specific features of the medium.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.