Skip Navigation

Literary and Linguistic Computing 1999 14(1):29-42; doi:10.1093/llc/14.1.29
© 1999 by Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sperberg-McQueen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Huitfeldt, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Concurrent document hierarchies in MECS and SGML

CM Sperberg-McQueenZ and C Huitfeldt

The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, Norway Z Corresponding author at: Computer Center (M/C 135), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1940 W Taylor St, Room 124, Chicago, IL 60612-72352, USA. E-mail: cmsmcq@acm.org

Applications of computers to humanistic research rely increasingly on SGML or XML markup; it is a persistent challenge to find suitable representations in these tree-based formalisms, for the overlap of textual features. SGML lends itself to a straightforward data model with a simple relationship between markup (element and attributes) and features or structures in the text. Barnard et al. (Computers and the Humanities, 22: 265-76, 1988; 29: 21131, 1995) and TEI (Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange, 1994) have presented methods for registering the existence of overlap using SGML notations, but these methods are often felt to be unsatisfactory, in part (we argue) because they complicate the otherwise straightforward SGML data model. The MECS and CONCUR notations described here allow the straightforward markup of overlapping textual features. CONCUR further allows the formulation of useful document grammars for concurrent hierarchies of textual features. The theoretical and practical advantages outweigh the practical disadvantages, and the humanities computing community should begin serious experimentation with CONCUR.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.