Skip Navigation

Literary and Linguistic Computing 1998 13(2):59-63; doi:10.1093/llc/13.2.59
© 1998 by Association for Literary & Linguistic Computing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SEO, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by CHOI, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

A Probabilistic Model for Dependency Parsing Considering Ascending Dependencies

KWANG J. SEO, KI C. NAM and KEY S. CHOI

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology Korea

In this study, we propose a new probability model for disambiguation in dependency parsing. In order to enhance accuracy, early dependencymodels used two parameters: disdance and the part of speech tag of the left sister derived from the world order within a sentence. However, these parameters are not appropriate in free order or elliptical languages such as German, Korean, and Russian. In the proposed model, instead of adopting parameters based on word order, ascending dependency was used to improve accuracy. Ascending dependency is defined as a relationship between a word and any ascendant word in the dependency hierarchy. This approach is useful for free order and the frequently elliptical languages, because in the dependency grammer the relationship between words is critical. The performance of the three models, including the proposed models of Collins and Eisner, was compared, when they were applied to Korean. These models were trained by 9,000 sentences and tested by 300 sentences sampled from the KIBS tree bank. The result showed that the proposed model works better in accuracy than Collins' model by 2.4% and Eisner's model by 2.1%.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.